GUILTY PARTY
Many of the party and wedding halls in the city where you celebrate occasions you hold dear or sacred operate illegally. They either have no licence or do not follow a sanctioned plan, reports Asha Menon.
Asha Menon
Out of 170 party halls in south Bangalore, 110 are unlicensed, according to a list drawn up by the BBMP’s Department of Health as of date December 11, 2008. This came as a reply to an RTI application that was filed by Ravindranath Guru of Coalition against Corruption (CAC).
On September 23, 2006, Guru had attended a meeting with Lokayukta Santosh Hegde and a few Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) officials. Various issues were discussed among which was the misuse of basements. Guru said that basements were being misused, unlicensed party halls were functioning and that many of the halls have not followed the sanctioned building plans. In the meeting it was decided that a survey was in order, to determine the extent of misuse. Those present included joint commissioner (zonal), joint commissioner and deputy joint commissioner for health and health officers (East, West, South).
A statement issued by the joint commissioner of south (health) regarding this meeting, says that the BBMP officials had asked their next in command to study the situation and send in their report by May 30, 2009. The officers were asked to investigate the allegations by collecting information on all halls in every zone, and checking if they had followed the sanctioned plans and if they have licences to operate.
If the allegations were indeed true, then BBMP must warn the operators that legal action can be initiated against them at any point. Also, the public must be informed that the halls are under scrutiny so that they are not cheated of their money. For this, the municipal authority must hang boards on illegally operating halls. The public notice must inform the public that these marriage halls are not legal and should not be rented out for functions.
Meanwhile, Guru was using the RTI Act to track the progress of his complaint. “In February 2007, under RTI Act, I filed an application asking for certified copies of executive orders issued on the decision taken at that meeting,” says Guru. The joint commissioner for south (health), BBMP, replied saying that 64 party halls operated out of the basement. The response did not give enough clarity on the question Guru had asked, and so he filed another RTI asking for the details of the 64 party halls with their addresses.
There was no immediate response, except that they would give the reply in a week. Guru got a reply after many months on December 11, 2008. “It said that there are 170 party halls out of which 110 are not licensed.” The reply says that there are 51 licensed ones and nine ones that had closed down.
“In February 2009, we filed a complaint with the Lokayukta’s office in this regard,” says Guru. What they had expected was a thorough inquiry into the corruption that made this illegal activity possible in such a large scale. “We wanted to know how this situation had come about,” says Guru. He was expecting halls to be closed and officers to be taken to task. Instead, he was told that action was being taken to license the halls. A few weeks ago, at the Lokayukta office, the CAC members were assured that “action was being taken.”
While the number of illegal halls in south Bengaluru is mind-boggling, Guru says that the situation is not very different in the other zones. “The Deputy Commissioner of Health’s reply to my RTI application says that out of 53 marriage halls, five do not have parking facility and 12 do not have licences. In the west, the reply said, out of 85 halls, 51 operate without a licence.”
In June 2009, BBMP put up boards on some of the halls, warning people against booking them. “Most of these halls have now taken these boards down and have started functioning,” says Guru. A public notice (dated June 6, 2009) given by the municipal authority, in a prominent English daily, orders the closure of some of the party/marriage halls. But, CityBuzz tried booking with three of the halls that were listed in the notice and they were open to taking a booking.
The first one, we spoke to, was Ganjam Kalyana Mantappa. It was the fifth on the list of “Party/marriage halls having no licence” (BBMP notice issued by the Office of the Commissioner, on June 6, 2009). The rates here are Rs 84,000 a day and they are open from 6am to 10pm. Catering will need to be arranged by us, they said. They do not accept cheques made out to the hall, but the Ganjam Nagappa and Son (HUF).
At Jayanagar’s GNR Kalyana Mantappa (number 17 on the list), the rates are Rs 1,05,000 for two days. It is Rs 60,000 for a day and extra for lighting, catering, etc. No cheques will be accepted here.
At Krishna Kalyana Mantappa in the same locality (number 18 on the list), the rates are Rs 95,000 for two days. This non-AC hall cannot be rented out for a day. No cheques will be accepted here, either.
We checked if there were any legal hassles and all the three halls assured us that there would be none.
Buildings and spaces being misused is a pet peeve with Guru. One of his earliest battles was against a party hall that operated in his residential locality in Banashankari. “In the 40×60 site, they were operating two party halls. One was in the basement and the second, on the first floor,” he says. It had been operating since 2000, and he moved permanently to the neighbourhood he had known for over three decades in 2003. When the deafening sound and traffic congestion got on the residents’ nerves, Guru filed an application under the RTI Act.
“There had been a small house in that compound and the owner of the hall had bought it and had taken a change of land use, for office space. It was not meant to be a party hall, but he ran one anyway. BBMP officials did not seem to bother with it. Also, the license issued in 2000 was for the earlier building (the small house) and not the new, larger one that was constructed on the same site. We took the matter to the High Court and it ordered the hall to be closed.” Today, shutters are down on the building.
Commissioner’s list of violators
A notice came out in an English daily, announcing the closure of some halls in the south Zone, on June 6, 2009. “The Commissioner of BBMP has ordered the closure of the following party/marriage halls falling under the south zonal jurisdiction of the BBMP that have not obtained the industrial licence officially and violated the building bye-laws by converting the basement parking facility into lunch homes and running industries.”
Party/marriage halls that have obtained licence but are not allowed to run lunch homes and yet violating the rule
- ChandragiriPalace, Chandra Layout
- SVParty Hall,KSExtension
- Nandini Party Hall, Padmanabha Nagara
- Deepashri Party Hall, BSK II Phase
- Urs Party Hall, BSK II Phase
- GK Party Hall, BSK II Phase
Party/marriage halls having no licence
- Balaji Kalyan Mantapa,Mysore Road
- Shadi Mahal, Bapujinagara
- Bhavasara Kshatriya Kalyana Mantapa,Gandhi Bazar Main Road
- Nageshwara Kalyana Mantapa,NAT Road
- Ganajam Kalyana Mantapa,Bull Temple Road
- Rai Rai Kalyana Mantapa,Pampa Mahakavi Road
- Chandrashekara Bharathi Kalyana Mantapa,Pamapamahakavi Road
- Sharada Prasad Kalyana Mantapa,Pampa Mahakavi Road
- Parvathamma Kalyana Mantapa,Bull Temple Road
- Jagadguru Renukacharya Kalyana Mantapa, SBN Hall
- Bharathi Krupa, Girinagara
- Smt Lakshmmma Venkata Rao Kalyana Mantapa, Girinagara
- Hanumanthappa Kalyana Mantapa, BSK III Stage
- Deepam Party Hall, BSK III Stage
- Krishna Convention Hall, Karesandra
- Sai Pushpanjali Kalyana Mantapa, JP Nagar
- GNR Kalyana Mantapa, Jayanagar
- KrishnaKalyana Mantapa, Jayanagar
- Samskruthi Party Hall, Jayanagar
- Lakshmi Venkateshwara Kalyana Mantapa,Kankapura Main Road
- Navarang Marriage Hall, Gurappana Palya
- Shyamanna Kalyana Mantapa, BTM Layout
The notice says that the named halls will be closed down at any time by the municipal authority and “steps will be taken to demolish buildings violating the building bye-laws”. It cautions the public from booking the halls.